sábado, dezembro 19, 2009

Climate Denial Crock of the Week - II

Posted by at
Labels: ,

2 comentários:

Olympus Mons disse...

E já agora, para comentar também este (gostava de ter pachorra para o fazer em mais detalhe), o prof. Soon pode ter relacionamentos com a Exxon através da filha da prima da enteada que era nora da sogra … Mas o o prof Phil Jones mostra-nos, nos seus emails que perto, perto, estava ele da Shell que até tinha acesso a colocar items nos sounding boards da Shell para terem fundos.

E hoje soube-se que um dos fundadores do REAL CLIMATE (William Connolley), um dos da “team” juntamente com Gavin, Mann,etc, foi banido do Wikipedia (dos privilégios de administrador que lhe permitia fazer o que quisesse).

“All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions. Acolytes whose writing conformed to Connolley’s global warming views, in contrast, were rewarded with Wikipedia’s blessings. In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.
The Medieval Warm Period disappeared, as did criticism of the global warming orthodoxy. With the release of the Climategate Emails, the disappearing trick has been exposed. The glorious Medieval Warm Period will remain in the history books, perhaps with an asterisk to describe how a band of zealots once tried to make it disappear."


nota: Isto foi antes do climategate.

20/12/09
Olympus Mons disse...

Dr. Miguel Araujo,È este o seu mundo? Reve-se neste tipo de cenário?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/a_climatology_conspiracy.html


Parece-lhe a si um mundo em que se possa atirar á cara como facto de argumentação as opiniões publicadas e o peer review? Parece-lhe isto o trabalho da ciencia?

20/12/09

Enviar um comentário

Subscrever: Enviar feedback (Atom)